This generation does not use Logic, they only use PC.
They are under control like the post WWII USSR. They are totally subject to the PC Party Line.
The controlling words sound like misogynist, narcissist, racist, bigot, homophobe, transphobe, sexist, and many other similar accusations of mental or social defect.
I maintain my position that all accusations are equivalent to the use of the “Hate Word”, “Nigger”, meaning, “Deserving Unmitigated Condemnation”.
The purpose of using the “Hate Word”, is to provide focus on the accused and to declare that they must be marginalized, Lynched, canceled, castrated, decapitated, incarcerated, fired, …, etc., etc., just like in the Soviet Union.
I recently made an Ole Skoole comment about my desire to hear my men’s basketball comments from men and primarily experienced basketball players. I referred to an NBA Today casting where 3 females where on set with a “Whiteboy Analyst” who never played. The females gave him permission to speak occasionally. (Don’t call me racist. Networks do not hire Black Analysts. They are usually referred to as Color Commentators, and I will let you figure out where in Hell that terminology was conceived.)
I was given the “Sexist” tag, indicating that I should be castrated immediately! There was no logic associated with the accusation, but simply a reference to what “PC Hate Word” to apply.
I entertained the accuser with the question of whether my expressed desire was sexual or sexist, and I provided analogy of my accusation of “Hate Speech” above.
Which accuser of “Hate Speech” is correct? The PC attack on my Ole Skoole desire to hear men’s basketball commentary from men or the PC calling out of “Sexist” (Nigger).
Defensive conversation had many elements and an additional accusation that my desire to hear from men was in fact, homosexual, meaning, “same sex”. This to me was proof positive that they have no ability to apply logic. There is no sexuality being expressed, whatsoever. My comment recognizes differences in men’s and women’s basketball, a game of skill and athleticism. The proper term should have been “Gender” in lieu of “Sex”. The division is cast when leagues declare that they are Men’s and Women’s. I am no more “Sexist” than the league that governs the players. I am simply recognizing the difference between the ball play. I do enjoy and enthusiastically support Female’s College and Professional Basketball! And yes, I firmly believe that a female commentator is more qualified to present female basketball than a male, subject to the occasional exception below.
You just may be “Sexist” if you somehow come to the conclusion that a female is better at describing men’s basketball than a retired or active men’s basketball player. We should not rule out the occasional female commentator that has put in work to achieve comparable status to a male commentator and vice versa. It is certainly not impossible. With 3 females and 1 marginalized analytics male, I am not hearing the shit, …, sorry.